Internal Investigations Romania
Board, audit committee and company investigations involving fraud, governance failures and regulatory scrutiny.
Our team brings together expertise across multiple disciplines to advise clients and identify the most effective solutions in investigations, governance and complex regulatory matters.
Our work centres on complex corporate and regulatory matters where legal analysis, strategic judgement and institutional exposure intersect. We advise boards, financial institutions and founders in situations that require clear, on-point counsel and the ability to navigate sensitive governance, investigative and regulatory environments.
Depending on the mandate, our role may extend from focused legal advice to the coordination of matters that require broader investigative, regulatory or dispute-management strategies. Engagements are structured to provide precise analysis while maintaining a clear understanding of the institutional, financial and reputational context in which decisions are taken.
Where additional technical expertise is required, we work with a flexible network of senior specialists - including professionals in forensic accounting, e-discovery, data analysis, tax, data privacy and crisis communications. These specialists are engaged as needed, under our direction and legal privilege, allowing us to assemble tailored teams while maintaining strict control over strategy, confidentiality and evidentiary integrity.
The firm conducts independent, legally privileged investigations into financial misconduct, systemic compliance failures, and governance breakdowns.
Instructions typically originate from boards, audit committees or other key stakeholders in response to whistleblower allegations, internal audit findings, regulatory contact or emerging governance concerns.
Mandates are structured around evidentiary integrity, preservation of legal privilege and careful exposure assessment across criminal, regulatory, civil, tax, insolvency and reputational dimensions. Investigations are designed not only to establish facts, but to support informed decision-making where legal risk and stakeholder confidence are closely intertwined.
For EU funds, public procurement and anti-corruption risk, see our EU Anti-Corruption Directive hub and EU Funds, Public Procurement & Financial Corrections.
Investigations are conducted with forensic discipline and robust privilege safeguards, ensuring that factual reconstruction remains reliable in the face of potential regulatory or judicial scrutiny.
Each mandate also includes an integrated assessment of legal exposure across multiple enforcement regimes.
Tax issues often emerge as part of broader internal investigations into financial misconduct, governance failures or suspected irregularities. We assist clients in examining potential tax exposure in parallel with criminal, regulatory, corporate and reputational risk, particularly where allegations involve under-declaration, artificial arrangements, improper deductions or the misuse of company structures.
Our work includes integrating tax-sensitive fact-finding into the wider investigation, assessing escalation risk and coordinating legal strategy where tax issues intersect with financial crime, insolvency, management liability or regulatory scrutiny.
For tax authority investigations and enforcement defence, see Tax Investigations & Tax Enforcement.
Where investigations intersect with regulatory oversight, we assist clients in structuring engagement with supervisory authorities while preserving procedural safeguards.
Investigations frequently lead to structural reforms designed to restore integrity and reduce future exposure.
Where investigations evolve into enforcement or criminal proceedings, we represent corporations, boards and senior executives in complex white-collar matters. These mandates often require navigation of criminal, regulatory, governance and reputational exposure simultaneously, including in circumstances involving multiple authorities, jurisdictions and internal stakeholders. Our role is to help clients respond with legal precision while maintaining strategic coherence across the wider matter.
The firm represents corporations, financial institutions, boards and senior executives in matters involving supervisory investigations, administrative sanctions and regulatory enforcement.
Instructions typically arise when regulators initiate inquiries, conduct inspections or commence sanction procedures, often in parallel with internal investigations, governance concerns or broader legal exposure.
Our mandates are structured to manage regulatory risk while preserving operational stability, strategic control and institutional credibility. Our approach combines procedural defence with substantive knowledge of the regulatory frameworks governing capital markets, financial institutions and other regulated sectors.
We assist organisations facing inquiries initiated by supervisory authorities.
Regulatory scrutiny often emerges suddenly and may threaten the operational continuity of an organisation. We assist clients in managing the immediate procedural and strategic consequences of such events.
Where regulatory inquiries develop into enforcement proceedings, we represent clients in administrative sanction procedures and related regulatory litigation.
We assist clients in matters involving tax investigations, enforcement measures and disputes arising from allegations of tax irregularities, under-declaration, fraudulent structuring or broader fiscal misconduct.
This work is particularly important where tax scrutiny develops in parallel with internal investigations, financial crime exposure, regulatory inquiries or management liability concerns - in such matters, tax risk must be examined together with criminal, administrative, corporate and reputational implications. Our team combines legal defence strategy with practical insight into tax investigation procedures and enforcement dynamics, drawing on direct experience within tax authority environments.
Where tax issues arise inside a broader internal investigation, see Tax-sensitive fact-finding within internal investigations.
We advise beneficiaries, companies, boards, investors and project promoters on EU-funded projects when compliance, audit findings, financial corrections or fraud allegations are at stake. These matters sit at the point where funding-contract obligations, procurement rules, administrative control and criminal-law exposure overlap.
Our job is concrete: establish what actually happened on the project, measure the legal and financial exposure that follows, and build a response the client can defend before an authority or a court.
Mandates typically arise from managing-authority reviews, audit-authority findings, Romanian Court of Accounts controls, whistleblower allegations, internal audits, acquisition due diligence, enforcement inquiries, or concern that implementation has departed from the funding, procurement or anti-fraud rules.
For legislative context, see our EU Anti-Corruption Directive hub.
We review EU-funded projects when an audit observation, an allegation of irregularity, or due diligence ahead of an acquisition calls for an independent legal assessment. The point is to reconstruct how the project was designed, approved, procured, implemented and reported, then test that record against what the funding contract actually required.
We advise on public procurement under Romanian and EU law, including Laws 98/2016, 99/2016 and 100/2016, and the remedies framework under Law 101/2016, where a procurement decision may face audit, control or criminal scrutiny. We look beyond the formal procedure to the actual sequence of decisions and the contents of the procurement file, because that is what drives eligibility and financial-correction risk.
We help clients assess and respond to financial corrections, audit findings and control conclusions that can reduce funding, trigger repayment, or run in parallel with an investigation.
We test how each finding was reasoned and substantiated, and whether it is genuinely connected to the irregularity alleged.
We support clients in their dealings with managing authorities, intermediate bodies and the Audit Authority that supervise and control EU-funded projects. How a client answers a request for information shapes the evidentiary record, so each submission is prepared with the later stages - escalation, enforcement, litigation - already in mind.
We examine suspected implementation irregularities and breaches of the funding contract - the cases that cannot be resolved by reading the file alone. These usually require reconstructing the project's decisions, deliverables, supplier interactions and the practical reasons implementation departed from the plan.
We advise where an EU-funded project or procurement decision creates criminal-law exposure, including matters that may reach the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) - competent for offences against the EU's financial interests - or Romanian prosecutors. Early on, the priority is to assess the risk, preserve privilege and the integrity of the evidence, and coordinate the administrative and criminal responses so they do not undercut each other.
We advise asset managers and listed companies, banks and other financial institutions on the legal and regulatory frameworks governing capital markets, banking and other financial services.
Our work often arises where regulatory compliance intersects with complex governance structures, strategic transactions or heightened supervisory attention.
We combine technical regulatory analysis with a broader understanding of governance, disclosure, capital structure and supervisory exposure.
We advise issuers, asset managers and institutional market participants on the regulatory obligations governing their activities.
We advise banks and other financial institutions on the regulatory obligations and supervisory requirements applicable to their activities.
We advise institutions on structuring governance and compliance systems capable of operating effectively within complex supervisory environments.
This regulatory practice is reinforced by our broader strength in governance, internal investigations and enforcement-sensitive matters, particularly where supervisory exposure, institutional decision-making and legal risk converge.
We advise boards, investors, founders and senior executives on governance architecture, fiduciary duties and disputes arising from ownership structures.
Our work often arises when governance arrangements come under pressure, including shareholder conflict, regulatory scrutiny of governance practices, or strategic transitions affecting control and ownership.
We combine corporate law analysis with a broader understanding of governance, regulatory exposure and the practical dynamics of board decision-making within complex institutional structures.
We advise boards and senior management on the design and calibration of governance systems capable of operating effectively in high-exposure environments.
We advise clients on the legal and strategic implications of ownership structures, governance rights and shareholder relationships.
Where shareholder relationships deteriorate into formal disputes, we represent clients in matters involving control, governance and corporate decision-making.
This practice is reinforced by our broader strength in internal investigations, regulatory exposure and enforcement-sensitive matters, particularly where governance failures, shareholder conflict and legal risk intersect.
Selected perspectives from the firm.
Focused pages for clients looking at specific Romania-facing practice areas, while the core expertise above remains the primary service presentation.
Board, audit committee and company investigations involving fraud, governance failures and regulatory scrutiny.
Corporate and individual defence in business-crime and enforcement-sensitive matters.
Supervisory inquiries, inspections and administrative sanction procedures.
Capital markets, banking, financial services and regulated-business risk.
Governance pressure, control dynamics and shareholder conflict.
EU-funded projects, procurement compliance, financial corrections, audit findings and enforcement-sensitive implementation issues.